* Jeffrey W. Baker <jwbaker@acm.org> [030529 23:34]: > On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 04:04, Bart Trojanowski wrote: > > > I see your point Peter. We _do_ want to make sure that packages we mark > > as x86-64/amd64 are bound only against /lib64 -- and running them is not > > sufficient since 32-bit programs will run just as well. I would think > > that this would be a good port-packaging test. It may even be a good > > idea to put it into debhelper. > > If you disable CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION in the kernel, I think you will not > be able to run 32-bit binaries, and this may be a good test condition. Good idea. And to tie it into the other thread I just responded to... We can only do this if we port all of the required packages to 64-bit. B. -- WebSig: http://www.jukie.net/~bart/sig/
Attachment:
pgp8mT5Bve88H.pgp
Description: PGP signature