Re: Bug#730258: please add arch-specific BTS tags
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> During a discussion about architecture qualification, the release team
> concluded that it would be interesting to have a better way to track
> architecture-specific bugs. It would be nice to have BTS tags for each
> architecture that is currently in the archive. It might also make
> sense to have tags for the architectures on debian-ports, to be able
> to filter issues about these easily.
This sounds reasonable; are only tags required, or do we need more
infrastructure than that?
These are the list of ports that I see:
amd64
armel
armhf
hurd-i386
i386
ia64
kfreebsd-amd64
kfreebsd-i386
mips
mipsel
powerpc
s390x
sparc
avr32
sh
What else am I missing? [I note that
http://www.debian.org/ports/#portlist-released seems to have a
reasonable list of ports, and
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/english/releases/sid/archive.data?view=markup
has another; I'd like to reference a canonical location for ports
(perhaps maintained by debian-ports or similar) so I don't have to
figure out for myself which ports need a tag and what that tag should
be, and which ports are just duplicates of other ports, and therefore
don't need a tag.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
"There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
-- Jeremy S. Anderson
Reply to: