Re: [BUG] libgcc1 1:4.5.3-8
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:39:28AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> No idea how it got missed, but simple "hello world" C programs wouldn't
> compile due to a missing "libgcc_s.so --> libgcc_s.so.1" symlink. If
> "ldconfig" is responsible for creating that symlink, then "ldconfig" is
> broken. "libc-bin" on my system is version 2.11.2-13. I'm guessing
> some kind of multi-arch transition issue.
Well on x86_64 I certainly see a number of them:
Is the -multilib responsible perhaps? Not sure.
I could certainly believe it could be multi-arch related.