Re: Bug#532447: xulrunner_1.9.0.10-1(alpha/unstable): FTBFS on alpha - test failure

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

[Ccing d-alpha now]

* Mike Hommey (mh@glandium.org) [090719 09:22]:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:56:09AM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 07:27 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > 
> > > Just given back on alpha. Lets see if it helps.
> > 
> > Doesn't look like it did. The version in experimental seems to build on
> > alpha though:
> > 
> > http://experimental.debian.net/fetch.php?&pkg=xulrunner&ver=1.9.1.1-1&arch=alpha&stamp=1247941851&file=log&as=raw
> 
> But the previous version, 1.9.1-1, failed, and there is really no
> difference in 1.9.1.1-1 that would explain that.
> 
> On the other hand, 1.9.1-1 was built with:
> Toolchain package versions: libc6.1-dev_2.9-13 g++-4.3_4.3.3-13
> gcc-4.3_4.3.3-13 binutils_2.19.1-1 libstdc++6_4.4.0-10
> libstdc++6-4.3-dev_4.3.3-13
> 
> while 1.9.1.1-1 was built with:
> Toolchain package versions: libc6.1-dev_2.9-13 g++-4.3_4.3.3-14
> gcc-4.3_4.3.3-14 binutils_2.19.1-1 libstdc++6_4.4.0-11
> libstdc++6-4.3-dev_4.3.3-14
> 
> Maybe this made the difference.

Any news on this bug report?


Alpha-porters, could you perhaps help here?



Cheers,
Andi