Re: Bug#377697: Clarification on upgrade order for etch, was: Re: rageircd ftbfs on alpha
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:18:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > since upstream is not willing to integrate a runtime check in the short
> > term and I cannot support such an intrusive unofficial patch (which, BTW,
> > does not exist at all ATM).
>
> Why do you say that it would be intrusive? It looks to me like a simple
> change to support building more than one select interface at a time, and
> using the best one that works. If such a patch existed, would you consider
> applying it?
I'd surely be willing to do so for rageircd.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835
Reply to: