Bug#350688: gcc-2.95: FTBFS
Hello Debian-Alpha porters,
Is some of you interested in investigating the FTBFS of gcc-2.95 on alpha ?
Cheers,
--
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
----- Forwarded message from Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> -----
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
To: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
Cc: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>,
350688@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#350688: gcc-2.95: FTBFS with new make
Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> It seems -25 FTBFS on alpha:
>
> <http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-2.95%26ver=2.95.4.ds15-25%26arch=alpha%26stamp=1149582600%26file=log>
Known problem, it also did so before.
> rm -f f771
> stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/alpha-linux-gnu/bin/ -DIN_GCC -g -O2 -W -Wal
> l -o ../f771 bad.o bit.o bld.o com.o data.o equiv.o expr.o global.o implic.o i
> nfo.o intrin.o lab.o lex.o malloc.o name.o parse.o proj.o src.o st.o sta.o stb.
> o stc.o std.o ste.o storag.o stp.o str.o sts.o stt.o stu.o stv.o stw.o symbol.o
> target.o top.o type.o version.o where.o `cat ../stamp-objlist` `if [ xobstack.
> o != x ]; then echo ../obstack.o; else true; fi` `case "stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -
> B/usr/alpha-linux-gnu/bin/" in "cc") if [ x != x ]; then echo ../; else true; f
> i ;; esac` `if [ x != x ]; then echo ../; else true; fi`
> ../loop.o: In function `init_loop':
> /build/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc/loop.c:407: relocation trunca
> ted to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `word_mode' defined in .scommon section in .
> ./emit-rtl.o
> ../loop.o: In function `compute_luids':
> /build/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc/loop.c:443: relocation trunca
> ted to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `max_uid_for_loop' defined in .scommon secti
> on in ../loop.o
> /build/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/src-native/gcc/loop.c:517: additional reloca
> tion overflows omitted from the output
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[5]: *** [../f771] Error 1
>
> Any hints ?
Nobody showed up to do significant 2.95 hacking for alpha. The most likely
course of action is for now to remove the alpha package.
Thiemo
----- End forwarded message -----
Reply to: