[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Requalification of Alpha for etch


On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 07:40:15PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> * More developers need to certify in that they're activly developing
>   on this architecture.

Added myself.
> * There needs to be another buildd. There have been numerous offers in
>   the past. I have no idea what to do to actually make it happen.

The problem, I guess, is more the hosting in a place with an
Alpha-knowledgable local admin than the machines. A good example is
faure and lully: the local admin doesn't know SRM and therefore faure
vanished a long while ago after a new kernel had to be installed...


Reply to: