Re: Requalification of Alpha for etch
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 07:40:15PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> * More developers need to certify in that they're activly developing
> on this architecture.
Added myself.
> * There needs to be another buildd. There have been numerous offers in
> the past. I have no idea what to do to actually make it happen.
The problem, I guess, is more the hosting in a place with an
Alpha-knowledgable local admin than the machines. A good example is
faure and lully: the local admin doesn't know SRM and therefore faure
vanished a long while ago after a new kernel had to be installed...
Cheers
Thimo
Reply to: