Re: Binary NMU needed for swisswatch
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 02:02:18AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> swisswatch 0.6-7.1 was badly numbered on alpha:
> [cjwatson@auric ~]$ madison swisswatch
> swisswatch | 0.6-7 | stable | source, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
> swisswatch | 0.6-7.1 | stable | alpha
> swisswatch | 0.6-7.1 | testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
> swisswatch | 0.6-7.1 | unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sh, sparc
> That is, 0.6-7.1 was just a recompile of 0.6-7 on alpha, but was
> numbered like a source NMU, so the real source NMU that followed it has
> never been built on alpha. Could someone please upload a binary NMU of
> swisswatch numbered as 0.6-7.1.1?
> I noticed this because alpha's swisswatch still uses /usr/doc, whereas
> all the others use /usr/share/doc.
Francesco P. Lovergine