Which version of SRM is correct?

To: Mike Browne <mike@microway.com>, nina@microway.com, debian-alpha@lists.debian.org
Cc: Jim Freels <fea@ornl.gov>
Subject: Which version of SRM is correct?
From: "Victor R. Cain" <vic@vicsfamily.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 15:36:43 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 3C3A06DB.60309@vicsfamily.net>
References: <36B46230.517130F9@usit.net> <36B74093.BBD9A0D8@microway.com> <36B76B1D.25B26B22@usit.net> <36B8C482.EF3DE1A9@microway.com> <36B8E9BC.89214DD7@usit.net> <36BB45B3.9AA4066@microway.com>

I bought a MicroWay Alpha Screamer in February, 1999 with RedHat
Linux 5.2.  I am trying to upgrade the AlphaBIOS to SRM and have been
having problems.  Can you tell me what version of SRM I should be
using with this system?

System Type: Alpha PC 164LX
Processor: Digital Alpha 21164, Rev 7.2
Speed:  533 MHz
AlphaBIOS Version: 5.66  980623.1709

Thanks,
Vic Cain

--

I have the simplest tastes. I am always satisfied with the best.------------------- -- Oscar Wilde

Victor R. Cain             (865)435-5084    Fax:(865)435-9709
E: vic@vicsfamily.net      Web: www.vicsfamily.net

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which version of SRM is correct?
  - From: Martin Sanborn <m-sanborn@nwu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Installation of woody with floppy disk images - where can I find the base dep packages?
Next by Date: Re: Problems with ntp, ntpdate and chrony
Previous by thread: Re: Problems with ntp, ntpdate and chrony
Next by thread: Re: Which version of SRM is correct?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread