Re: Second NIC on Alpha XLT-300
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Tue 20 Feb 2001, Donald Spoon wrote:
> > OK, BUT a "ping" from the Alpha machine brings up an error
> > message indicating a bad CRC checksum and consistantly
> > identifies byte 42 as being the "mangled" one. Needless to
>
> What version ping do you use? I recently fixed something
> similar in a ping in unstable. However, on potato, the ping
> from netbase 3.18-4 should work (works for me :-)
>
...
> > Alpha from another machine, it appears to respond correctly.
>
> This would be consistent with a buggy ping program.
I'm seeing something like this too:
PING sligo.dnd.net (10.0.0.6): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.0.0.6: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=1.3 ms
wrong data byte #8 should be 0x8 but was 0x18
c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2a 2b
2c 2d 2e 2f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
And from kern.log:
Feb 21 12:04:12 tramore kernel: ping(1866): unaligned trap at 00000001200030e4: 00000001200273b4 29 1
This is ping from 'netkit-ping' version 0.10-6. I'm not sure when things
broke, but i'm certain that ping used to work. The network is functioning
perfectly otherwise: I've seen transfer rates of 10Mbyte/s.
This is on an Alpha XL-266, kernel 2.4.1. Most probably it's not the
kernel, this thing has seen all 2.3.x kernels that would compile and boot.
~~ Wieger
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
Reply to: