Re: glibc 2.2 and gcc (Was Re: something completely different)
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 03:26:56AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 09:19:08PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > > Oh, and by the way, the libstdc++.so versioning madness isn't applied
> > > > for the Hurd :-). There's definitely no reason for a seperate
> > > > libstdc++ package for glibc 2.2 on the Hurd.
> >
> > Why does hurd not have this problem? Does it have libstdc++? What is the
> > soname of the library? If it's based on the libc version, like all the
> > rest, then it will have that problem, just like everyone else.
>
> ulysses:/gnu/lib# objdump -p libstdc++.so.2.10.0 | grep SONAME
> SONAME libstdc++.so.2.10.0
>
> The Hurd has not the long history of linux libc conversions, so we don't
> need to carry the same amount of cruft with us. The libc soname is not
> included in libstdc++ at all.
<jealous>Damn, why can't this be the case with non-hurd?</jealous>
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: