Re: glibc 2.2 and gcc (Was Re: something completely different)
>
> Depend: hurd (>= 20000803)
>
Looks more appropriate, we don't want to force removal of hurd because of
a conflict resolution.
> > Oh, and by the way, the libstdc++.so versioning madness isn't applied
> > for the Hurd :-). There's definitely no reason for a seperate
> > libstdc++ package for glibc 2.2 on the Hurd.
Why does hurd not have this problem? Does it have libstdc++? What is the
soname of the library? If it's based on the libc version, like all the
rest, then it will have that problem, just like everyone else.
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: