On Thu 28 Oct 1999, Christopher C Chimelis wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Paul Slootman wrote: > > > Hmm, I still have libc6.1_2.1.2-5, would that be OK? > > Actually I'm still running libc6.1_2.1.2-2 ... > > I believe -5 is bad unless you don't plan on developing on the box and > needing static binaries. Same goes for any version of 2.1.2 prior to > 5.0.1. Hmm, what would be the symptoms? I've not noticed anything so far... Paul