Re: 2.2.x corruption solved (Was Re: Statically linked 'tar')

To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>, Bart Warmerdam <bartw@xs4all.nl>, debian-alpha@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, Written by Bernhard Fastenrath <fasten@informatik.uni-bonn.de>
Subject: Re: 2.2.x corruption solved (Was Re: Statically linked 'tar')
From: Martin Lucina <mato@kotelna.sk>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 23:38:05 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19991012233805.C6622@kotol.kotelna.sk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19991013094439.F283@strangepork.lab.nz.eds.com>
References: <[🔎] 19991012092828.D283@strangepork.lab.nz.eds.com> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.10.9910121505530.646-100000@alpha.random> <[🔎] 19991013094439.F283@strangepork.lab.nz.eds.com>

Please direct any further followups to <mato@kotelna.sk>.
I have also re-subscribed myself to debian-alpha from this address.

Reply to:

References:
- 2.2.x corruption solved (Was Re: Statically linked 'tar')
  - From: Martin Lucina <mato@nz.eds.com>
- Re: 2.2.x corruption solved (Was Re: Statically linked 'tar')
  - From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
- Re: 2.2.x corruption solved (Was Re: Statically linked 'tar')
  - From: Martin Lucina <mato@nz.eds.com>

Prev by Date: apt-get install XXX doesn't work now!
Next by Date: Re: gnome dependancies and X still broken
Previous by thread: bsddisklabel and BLKRRPART
Next by thread: Re: Statically linked 'tar'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread