[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: XFree86...



On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Jean-Paul Blaquiere wrote:

> > On Sep 08, Ron Farrer scrawled :
> 
> > Does anyone have a 20" monitor, Matrox Milennium (original), working at
> > 24bpp or better? I am having a heck of a time getting a config that has a
> > resolution that I like at anything over 8bpp... Everything below (and
> > including) 800 x 600 works at 24bpp, but anything higher (1024 x 786 is
> > what I want) will only run in 8bpp mode. FYI, I am using xf86config.
> > 
> i'd love to say yes, but I have a Matrox Mill (2MB) but I can only use it at
> 640x480 due to monitor limitations.  If i get the chance this week/end, I'll
> see if i can borrow a monitor and play with larger resolutions.
> (btw, AS 255/233 (avanti) also with XFree)

I also have the 2MB verison (see my other post a few minutes ago).

This monitor (a 20" IBM P200) will do 1600 x 1200 @ 75Hz non-interlaced
(supposedly). Its horizontal frequency is: 30-96Hz and its vertical
frequency is: 48-160Hz. Max addressability: 1600 x 1280, max flicker-free:
1600 x 1200. - If that helps anyone with an idea...

I entered the vertical and horizontal frequency in xf86config by choosing
the 'other' options.

Does anyone know how to disable 8bpp and 16bpp? I tried entering zero for
those, but X said it could find a display or something similar.



Thanks,

Ron

=========================
= Ronald Burnett Farrer =
=========================
------------------------------------
- "mailto://rbf@magnesium.net";     -
- "http://www.magnesium.net/~rbf/"; -
------------------------------------
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| If you let Windows dominate, expect the worst: |
| "WORLD.SYS is corrupt, reboot UNIVERSE Y/n"    |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????
? "How could this [Y2K Bug] be a problem in a country ?
? where we have Intel and Microsoft?" -- Al Gore      ?
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????


Reply to: