Re: Freeze of Hamm in other architectures

To: Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>
Cc: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, debian-alpha@lists.debian.org, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Freeze of Hamm in other architectures
From: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@law.miami.edu>
Date: 03 Apr 1998 16:26:33 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] ylfjn2e2fvg6.fsf@law.miami.edu>
In-reply-to: Brian White's message of "Fri, 03 Apr 1998 14:56:05 -0500"
References: <[🔎] 35253ED5.15D2909A@verisim.com>

Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com> writes:
> What is the general consensus about the stability of each of these
> architectures (powerpc, alpha, and sparc)?  Should they be release with
> the i386 and m68k versions as 2.0 or should that wait until a later time
> (perhaps 2.1)?

Alpha is stable, but not feature-complete.

I could be convinced either way.

Mike.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Freeze of Hamm in other architectures
  - From: Guenter Geiger <geiger@iem.mhsg.ac.at>

References:
- Freeze of Hamm in other architectures
  - From: Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>

Prev by Date: Freeze of Hamm in other architectures
Next by Date: Done up.. xfig
Previous by thread: Freeze of Hamm in other architectures
Next by thread: Re: Freeze of Hamm in other architectures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread