Re: Concerns about ROCm QA
Hi,
On 2025-11-26 15:13, Christian BAYLE wrote:
> Le 26/11/2025 à 07:50, Andrew Lee a écrit :
>> Do we already have document for the package update order? It would
>> be very nice to have more infomation on team wiki or somewhere
>> links from the team wiki.
We used to coordinate through a wiki page, see 5.7 [1] and 6.1 [2].
Though through the team-project, we have many more tools to coordinate
work than just a wiki.
Also, note that we have a team-global issue tracker [3], for anyone who
wants to see open MRs, or who wants to contribute to infra and tooling.
> recently I found this:
> https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/blob/develop/docs/continuous-integration.md
Interesting. I like this.
It has something in common with our CI in that tests cascade, like the
rocprim trigger -> hipcub, roctrhust jobs mentioned.
On our side, we go one step further, testing all reverse dependencies
one step outside of the ROCm graph, like ucx, spfft. And we can also
test more distributions.
> There is also some work going on on ubuntu ppa
> https://launchpad.net/~bullwinkle-team/+archive/ubuntu/rocm-devel
Also interesting. I wish this would have been communicated more.
>From what I can tell, most of the packages of that ppa are rebuilds of
our own packages.
hipblas, hiprand, rocfft seem newer so their changes could be imported,
getting some of the synergy that was expected.
> I had a look at llvm-toolchain-rocm rebuilded and pushed on
> https://apt.ai.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/llvm-toolchain-rocm/
> because I was trying to fix a build issue on hipblaslt
> To make it usable I also rebuilded
> https://apt.ai.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rocm-hipamd/
> with llvm-toolchain-rocm dependancy but it's not debian grade, as the
> package went native.
>
> At the moment I didn't find any reason to package amdclang in debian.
There have been a few discussions about this on the list, there are
arguments for and against this.
> For documentation I made this https://rocm-team.pages.debian.net/ with
> the ROCm doc packaged system (Eat my own dog food ...)
Christian, this is great!
I had a table like this in [1, 2] because we were lacking an overview,
but that became moot.
Best,
Christian
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/rocm-team/community/team-project/-/wikis/rocm-5.7-release-plan
[2]: https://salsa.debian.org/rocm-team/community/team-project/-/wikis/rocm-6.1-release-plan
[3]: https://salsa.debian.org/groups/rocm-team/-/issues
Reply to: