Hi Santiago,
I believe this bug ("FTBFS with GCC 15") is fixed in the above
version, so I'm closing it by hand now.
I don't know how I screwed up twice, but 6.4.1-2 FTBFS as well. I'll do a third upload after triple-checking my work and then this should be fixed.
While we are at it, I noticed a very significant raise in the amount of memory allocated while building the package, from 2GB in trixie to 14GB in current unstable (using machines with 2 CPUs). Is this normal/expected?
The hipblas tests have adopted a structure more similar to rocblas and they're also building two binaries now instead of one. I think the new upstream design is just more resource intensive to build and run.
I guess it's normal.
Sincerely,
Cory Bloor