[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: tarballs for rocm-libraries



Hello,

all these moves are quite confusing
There is a document here
https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/blob/develop/docs/migration-process.md

I wonder if we should continue using the various tarballs or have some kind of standard watch file to extract subprojects

for rocm-systems and rocm-libraries

we could probably also gather some lib based on the
https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/blob/develop/docs/continuous-integration.md graph to facilitate transitions

This would also be a good idea we share more with fedora as it was already suggested by Cory if I remember well, and thank you for sharing this.

I suppose one of the starting point for fedora is
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/HC

Quite interesting to be able to compare easily
https://trix.fedorapeople.org/composable_kernel.spec
and
https://salsa.debian.org/rocm-team/composable-kernel/-/blob/experimental/debian/rules

and to work on common tarballs ;-)


Le 06/11/2025 à 16:00, Rix, Tom a écrit :
[Public]


If you look at the ROCm repositories ex/ ROCm/rocBLAS: [DEPRECATED] Moved to ROCm/rocm-libraries repo <https://github.com/rocm/rocBLAS>

You will see that they are being moved to a mono repo rocm-libraries ROCm/rocm-libraries: monorepo for rocm libraries <https://github.com/ ROCm/rocm-libraries> and other mono repo rocm-systems

While tarballs are still being posted to the old locations, there are problems now with projects without existing individual public locations.

Hipblaslt is now dependent on a code generator ‘origami’ rocm-libraries/ shared/origami at develop · ROCm/rocm-libraries <https://github.com/ ROCm/rocm-libraries/tree/develop/shared/origami>

For Fedora, I have submitted this PR to create tarballs similar to the llvm-project as a first step.

A script for exporting tarballs. by trixirt · Pull Request #2494 · ROCm/ rocm-libraries <https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/pull/2494>

Please review to make sure it will work for you as well.

I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work

Ideally one would update just the tarball URL for the projects to the new (not yet implemented) tarball location.

Is the plan to create an ROCm/origami project ?

And we could gently migrate packages to use to the new locations.

Tom


Christian B.



Reply to: