Re: miopen_5.5.1+dfsg2-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Hi Mo,
On 2025-07-28 20:38, M. Zhou wrote:
Does that mean the missing dependencies for pytorch-rocm are all in
place?
No. We need hipblaslt. :(
Unfortunately, when I tried to update Kari's work-in-progress hipblaslt
package to the latest upstream release, I discovered some files that do
not conform to the DFSG [1]. I'll need to prepare a patch for the
library to build without them. I'm tempted to just upload the older
version that worked, but I'll try to fix the newer version first.
The magma-rocm package has also been sitting in the NEW queue for a
while, for reasons that are unclear to me [2]. I haven't managed to get
an answer for what the problem is, but I'm not worrying too much until
after Trixie releases. I'm told it's possible to build without it, but
it will be a pytorch-rocm B-D when it becomes available.
Spaarsh is working on gloo-rocm and apparently has it building. I'm also
told that it's possible to build without gloo, but it will be a
pytorch-rocm B-D when it becomes available.
Sincerely,
Cory Bloor
[1]: https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-libraries/issues/798
[2]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/magma-rocm_2.9.0+ds-2.html
Reply to: