Hi Christian, Christian Kastner, on 2025-07-24: > On 2025-07-24 09:29, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> Christian Kastner, earlier: >>> PS: If you are using rocm-target-arch in a package build, please also >>> use the --for-build option, which will pick the arch list for the >>> distribution in d/changelog. experimental currently has more arches >>> then unstable. >> >> I was surprised by the option name. It resonates with build/host/target >> triples, but apparently it has nothing to do with that? I'd advise >> renaming it to avoid confusion. > > "build" unfortunately resonates with a lot of things. In this context, > it refers to a package build, like dpkg-buildpackage would do. […] > Thoughts, all? If the word "build" is the problem, then how about unconfusing with "--for-pkg-build"? Or remove the "build" word entirely with "--for-compilation"? I guess the latter may make less sense since dpkg-buildpackage builds packages without necessarily always involving compiled language compilation steps. Naming things is hard, in hope this helps, -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from my alarm clock `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature