Re: Running the starpu autopkgtest on ci.rocm?
Hi Samuel,
On 2025-07-22 13:14, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I got a look at the rocm talks at debconf, took a look at ci.rocm, and
> tried it.
>
> I am surprised that ci.rocm hadn't already tried to run the starpu
> testsuite. In unstable, it depends on libamdhip64-dev and
> libhipblas-dev, was that not enough to trigger a build on ci.rocm?
For one, I just noticed that something is off with the scheduler. It
correctly identifies all triggers, but some (or all?) jobs are not being
created in debci as a response. The scheduler re-identifies the same
missing triggers hourly.
I didn't change anything, so I don't know what broke. I'll need to look
into this, but I won't get to this before the weekend.
> Actually it was indeed not enough for starpu to enable its hip driver,
> so the eventual binaries don't currently depend on rocm, only the source
> package build-depends on some of it. Is that perhaps why ci.rocm didn't
> try it?
Correct, we currently trigger on binary package dependencies.
Which is not quite right in itself, we should trigger on d/test/control
dependencies. But that adaptation requires more work than I can dedicate
to it right now.
Best,
Christian
Reply to: