Re: RFC: Centralized ROCm target list + utility

[Cordell Bloor <cgmb@slerp.xyz>]

Just to clarify,

On 2025-07-03 02:27, Cordell Bloor wrote:

> > I think the main
> >         contentious design designs should be addressed, namely:
> >         
> >         
> >            * Name of the utility for building: rocm-target-isa
> >         
> >            * Name of the binary package field documenting what was used
> >         
> >             X-ROCm-GPU-ISA
> >         
> >         
> >         Please respond soon if you object to this.
> >         
> >       
>       
>       I would just suggest that you consider whether it's better to be
>       "ROCm" or "AMD". If a package were built with GCC's support for
>       AMD GPUs [4] (which is not part of ROCm), would you want it to
>       have this tag? If so, I would replace "ROCm" with "AMD".
>       
>

I ask this only with regards to "X-ROCm-GPU-ISA". The "rocm-target-isa" utility is clearly rocm-specific.

Sincerely,
Cory Bloor