Re: RFS: hipblas-common/6.4.0-1 [ITP] -- Header-only common library for hipBLAS and hipBLASLt
On 2025-06-10 20:19, Cordell Bloor wrote:
> I don't think hipblaslt is necessary at build-time for newer rocblas
> versions.It's strongly recommended to be available at runtime for best
> performance on CDNA 3and RDNA 4architectures, but I'm pretty sure it's
> optional.
That's exactly my motivation -- I need the best-performant version for
llama.cpp/ggml, otherwise there is little point in choosing our HIP
version over some other third-party build.
Best,
Christian
Reply to: