Re: RFS: hipblas-common/6.4.0-1 [ITP] -- Header-only common library for hipBLAS and hipBLASLt
- To: debian-ai@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: RFS: hipblas-common/6.4.0-1 [ITP] -- Header-only common library for hipBLAS and hipBLASLt
- From: Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 23:17:05 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 0f4d9fbe-e6e1-4b34-aa60-2b65d2f7449b@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <355e481e-a6a9-4c91-b1e7-64fba8c9675d@slerp.xyz>
- References: <CAMNnwrJgwC6hsBA3ytJmdgY8OSsRKRy8Lae7v73THBayeQn0ZA@mail.gmail.com> <355e481e-a6a9-4c91-b1e7-64fba8c9675d@slerp.xyz>
Hi Cory, Spaarsh,
On 2025-05-29 23:06, Cordell Bloor wrote:
> Phil Wyett and I have done some back-and-forth with Spaarsh on the
> hipblas-common package he prepared. There have been a number of fixes
> and improvements made through that process. If one of the DDs on the
> ROCm Team could now take a look at this RFS, it would be much appreciated.
I assume hipblas-common was in preparatign for hipblaslt, as per
Spaarsh's GSoC self-introduction?
I would need a newer rocblas and it seems that hipblaslt is a dependency
of it.
Just for reference, Kari was working on this last year, so there is no
need to start from scratch. Here is the relevant thread [1].
Best,
Christian
[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-ai/2024/03/msg00093.html
Reply to: