Re: Inquiry about GSoC 2025 Debian ROCm proposal
On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 23:51 +0800, 黃柏竣 wrote:
>
> Originally, I intended to work on onnxruntime and its dependency for GSoC proposal since I have some experience with ONNX [1], but both onnx and onnxruntime appear to be up to date in this page [2]. Based on your
> suggestion, would it make sense for me to switch to packaging llama.cpp and its dependencies for Debian?
>
> [1]: https://github.com/ExplorerRay/onnxinfo
> [2]: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=debian-ai%40lists.debian.org
While onnx and onnxruntime are already in the archive, you can still take
a look at onnxruntime-rocm and (potentially) onnxruntime-cuda. The current
version is CPU only.
llama.cpp is already packaged by Christian
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/llama.cpp_4831+dfsg-1~exp2.html
Reply to: