Re: llama.cpp, whisper.cpp, ggml: Next steps

To: debian-ai@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: llama.cpp, whisper.cpp, ggml: Next steps
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 09:05:12 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] sa6zfhu7hon.fsf@hjemme.reinholdtsen.name>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] sa634fn86uv.fsf@hjemme.reinholdtsen.name>
References: <da7bd40e-9157-4b3a-b9d7-629ea0761e63@debian.org> <sa634gb1msz.fsf@hjemme.reinholdtsen.name> <31ba38cb-7601-4f89-a186-3dc5420856ea@debian.org> <sa6zfia6wys.fsf@hjemme.reinholdtsen.name> <a0985ace-6275-4949-aef2-21f355a55389@debian.org> <sa6ikowlnph.fsf@hjemme.reinholdtsen.name> <[🔎] b24ee3bb-c517-46ab-ab82-d8f0d6e20e26@debian.org> <[🔎] sa634fn86uv.fsf@hjemme.reinholdtsen.name>

Via <URL: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/03/msg00183.html >
I came across the lrc  tool from the  licenserecon package, and using it
on whisper.cpp I found a few issues.  Most of them were copied from the
d/copyright file on ggml/, and should be fixed there.

Just mention it here, as I suspect everyone struggle a bit with getting
debian/copyright correct, and automatically discovering inconsistencies
might be the way forward.

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: llama.cpp, whisper.cpp, ggml: Next steps
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>

References:
- Re: llama.cpp, whisper.cpp, ggml: Next steps
  - From: Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org>
- Re: llama.cpp, whisper.cpp, ggml: Next steps
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>

Prev by Date: rocm-docs-core
Next by Date: python3.10
Previous by thread: Re: llama.cpp, whisper.cpp, ggml: Next steps
Next by thread: Re: llama.cpp, whisper.cpp, ggml: Next steps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread