Re: hipblas optional dependency on rocsolver

[Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>]

[Cordell Bloor]
> I initially felt that hipblas should mark librocsolver0 as Recommends, 
> as it has historically been something that users can expect to be 
> included (and is typically included on other distributions). Though, I 
> do have a hard time saying with a straight face that it would be unusual 
> to install libhipblas0 without librocsolver0, as I suspect that will be 
> common for applications such as llama.cpp. As per the policy manual, 
> that would then imply it should be Suggests [2]. Still, I'm quite 
> uncertain. Your feedback would be appreciated on this matter.

As long as the message presented when trying to use the method without
librocsolver0 installed is informative and suggest to install
librocsolver0, I believe Suggests will be just fine. :)

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen