Re: Architectures for packages

To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@gmail.com>
Cc: Cordell Bloor <cgmb@slerp.xyz>, Debian ROCm Team <debian-ai@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Architectures for packages
From: Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2025 10:24:00 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 6ce2ab9bc0edf11aeb3de0216069941d@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 380cf77e-e05a-48ce-b7fe-2807ce8db7ec@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 8fce6eee-fb80-400a-8904-bce01e759428@gmail.com> <[🔎] 5b1059ac-6c26-4990-a8b9-029df4e72146@debian.org> <[🔎] dc23242b-3d77-4c17-8615-556cc435baa4@slerp.xyz> <[🔎] 380cf77e-e05a-48ce-b7fe-2807ce8db7ec@gmail.com>

Hi Mario,

the recent FTBFS stems from trying to import Linux-specific headers, so
linux-any sounds right.

Best,
Christian

On 2025-02-08 06:53, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Cordell, Christian,
> 
> How do you feel about changing from "any" to "linux-any" for rocm-smi?

Reply to:

References:
- Architectures for packages
  - From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@gmail.com>
- Re: Architectures for packages
  - From: Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org>
- Re: Architectures for packages
  - From: Cordell Bloor <cgmb@slerp.xyz>
- Re: Architectures for packages
  - From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: whisper.cpp backage structure based on llama.cpp hwcaps setup
Next by Date: rocm-smi-lib_6.1.2-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Previous by thread: Re: Architectures for packages
Next by thread: Processed: tags
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread