[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RFS: rocblas/5.5.1+dfsg-7~exp1 -- ROCm library for basic linear algebra



Hello,

I've finally completed the changes decided upon after submitting an RFS for the rocblas library back in July [1][2]. This new RFS treats the benchmark client in exactly the same way as the test client was treated.

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rocblas":

 * Package name     : rocblas
   Version          : 5.5.1+dfsg-7~exp1
 * URL              : https://github.com/rocmsoftwareplatform/rocblas
 * License          : Expat and BSD-3-clause, Expat, Expat or NCSA, Expat and BSD-3-Clause-Open-MPI
 * Vcs              : https://salsa.debian.org/rocm-team/rocblas
   Section          : devel

The source builds the following binary packages:

  librocblas0 - ROCm library for basic linear algebra - library
  librocblas-dev - ROCm library for basic linear algebra - headers
  librocblas0-bench - ROCm library for basic linear algebra - benchmarks
  librocblas0-tests - ROCm library for basic linear algebra - tests
  librocblas0-tests-data - ROCm library for basic linear algebra - test data
  librocblas-doc - ROCm library for basic linear algebra - documentation

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/rocblas/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rocblas/rocblas_5.5.1+dfsg-7~exp1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 rocblas (5.5.1+dfsg-7~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Add librocblas0-bench package.
   * Add d/p/0025-spelling.patch to fix spelling error in rocblas-bench.
   * d/rules: fix path to rocblas-test in build tests
   * d/rules: reduce build tests to a reasonable subset of autopkgtests
     so that maintainers actually run them.

Regards,
-- 
  Cordell Bloor

[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-ai/2024/07/msg00100.html
[2]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-ai/2024/09/msg00100.html


Reply to: