Re: strongly disagree with OSAID 1.0-rc1

To: debian-ai@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: strongly disagree with OSAID 1.0-rc1
From: Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:13:24 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 855e4251-27de-4ff2-bce0-25eb3cb4a74b@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87y12gqp2z.fsf@moose>
References: <[🔎] CALDQ5NzvprgaRTbvh=AxossbMNuWa28oqPMrZrgbGa76CV9Bfw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] f43c9521a3f9cad29f3e0fff3b1c7da8c7326c7e.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] f0b595eb-1172-4a9b-b618-8ac9be904717@debian.org> <[🔎] cd831cdb-5067-4d5e-b2a9-42444ef03212@debian.org> <[🔎] CAMr=8w7QO=dwHnQEAHxP33nrnXssdRvQrmEoBNZEdEqrpJk-Fw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 87y12gqp2z.fsf@moose>

On 2024/10/22 14:50, Gard Spreemann wrote:

I'll second the GR if it is proposed.

Thanks,
Aron

Me too.

As would I. Unfortunately life has been happening of late, and I'mtrying to catch up on some Debian stuff. If time permits I'll alsocontribute to the GR text itself.


thanks to everyone involved!

-Jonathan

Reply to:

References:
- Open Source Initiative: Open Source AI Definition rc1 published
  - From: James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net>
- strongly disagree with OSAID 1.0-rc1 (was: Re: Open Source Initiative: Open Source AI Definition rc1 published
  - From: "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org>
- Re: strongly disagree with OSAID 1.0-rc1
  - From: Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org>
- Re: strongly disagree with OSAID 1.0-rc1
  - From: Mo Zhou <lumin@debian.org>
- Re: strongly disagree with OSAID 1.0-rc1
  - From: Aron Xu <aron@debian.org>
- Re: strongly disagree with OSAID 1.0-rc1
  - From: Gard Spreemann <gspr@nonempty.org>

Prev by Date: pytorch-cuda_2.4.1-4_arm64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Next by Date: Processing of onednn_3.5.3-3_source.changes
Previous by thread: Re: strongly disagree with OSAID 1.0-rc1
Next by thread: Re: strongly disagree with OSAID 1.0-rc1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread