Re: rocthrust_5.7.1-2.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

To: debian-ai@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: rocthrust_5.7.1-2.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
From: Cordell Bloor <cgmb@slerp.xyz>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 01:42:30 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] e9a7aeb4-efec-4c17-8c58-f457fc766054@slerp.xyz>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E1rwmG7-00AE5q-K1@fasolo.debian.org>
References: <[🔎] E1rwmG7-00AE5q-K1@fasolo.debian.org>

Hi folks,

On 2024-04-16 11:06, Debian FTP Masters wrote:

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 18:21:04 +0200
Source: rocthrust
Built-For-Profiles: noudeb
Architecture: source
Version: 5.7.1-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian ROCm Team <debian-ai@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
Closes: 1064730
Changes:
 rocthrust (5.7.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Reintroduce fallback in invoke_result with upstream proposed
     and acked patch (Closes: #1064730)

I owe Gianfranco a big "thank you" for this rocthrust fix. Is there ateam-blessed way to reconcile NMU changes with Salsa? Just grab theuploaded source and commit it with Gianfranco as the author?


Sincerely,
Cory Bloor

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rocthrust_5.7.1-2.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
  - From: Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org>

References:
- rocthrust_5.7.1-2.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
  - From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>

Prev by Date: hipfft_5.7.1-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Next by Date: Re: CI hardware wishlist
Previous by thread: rocthrust_5.7.1-2.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Next by thread: Re: rocthrust_5.7.1-2.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread