Re: CI: Updates to the scheduler
On 2024-03-25 21:25, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2024-03-25 19:45, Cordell Bloor wrote:
>> I also notice that the rocthrust tests were triggered despite that they
>> do not depend on any rocprim package at run-time [4]. I suppose the
>> scheduler needs to trace the dependency tree via the source packages for
>> reasons you've discussed in the past, but it's a good case study to
>> highlight the value of further improvements to the scheduler.
>
> This looks like the scheduler did not honor the restriction to check
> only the -tests packages. (libhipcub-dev and librocthrust-dev depend on
> librocprim-dev, and both hipcub and rocthrust were triggered).
I'm not sure this is a bug. This looks more like a corner case of our
scheduling of all reverse dependencies. I've updated [7] with more info,
though I haven't concluded anything yet.
Best,
Christian
> [7] https://salsa.debian.org/rocm-team/rocm-dev-tools/-/issues/15
Reply to: