[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

rocfft_5.5.0-5_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable



Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



Accepted:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 11:42:37 +0200
Source: rocfft
Architecture: source
Version: 5.5.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian ROCm Team <debian-ai@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org>
Closes: 1042584 1049029
Changes:
 rocfft (5.5.0-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Cordell Bloor ]
   * Fix FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1 (Closes: #1042584)
 .
   [ Christian Kastner ]
   * Fix ftbfs-source-after-build.
     By removing the built documentation in the 'clean' target, and by
     ignoring __pycache__ directories (wherever they are). (Closes: #1049029)
   * Filter cf-protection hardening from device code
     Fixes a FTBFS with dpkg >= 1.22
   * Auto-fail tests on gfx1034 until soft lockup is resolved
   * Add myself to Uploaders
Checksums-Sha1:
 522eec9ed7c87e8aebde58d07c67b8e9d38c7088 2730 rocfft_5.5.0-5.dsc
 f5feb22a07d7f60cdb1c8a6ce84d07f9823612d5 10236 rocfft_5.5.0-5.debian.tar.xz
 4abdca7c2d4da5c6cdf13820a00ac07a32dec3ef 7461 rocfft_5.5.0-5_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 5b6802e8756880ab3fd09e7766d26eb75dc892f861031aa1e480c134b6a38344 2730 rocfft_5.5.0-5.dsc
 ddd345fc907762cd3a74f40ec9dd58d075ecafcac06f3dd147111402f4107530 10236 rocfft_5.5.0-5.debian.tar.xz
 8cc52c6754edef32b68f8b977a9c803c36854b1f2855ec8ef19c7dd29608101a 7461 rocfft_5.5.0-5_source.buildinfo
Files:
 e73d0f18046dace06765d1dc5ecd4144 2730 devel optional rocfft_5.5.0-5.dsc
 151c33534050f805fc94490a23d95da9 10236 devel optional rocfft_5.5.0-5.debian.tar.xz
 69d93a4d4c341624a3148f0d32724084 7461 devel optional rocfft_5.5.0-5_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ZB/j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: