Hi all, Cordell Bloor, on 2023-02-22: > On 2/21/23 14:06, Christian Kastner wrote: > > I propose that unless we expect this builds to pass and the packages to > > also be usable, we should initially limit to: > > > > Architecture: amd64 arm64 ppc64el > That seems reasonable. I initially hoped to bring some support at least to the riscv64 architecture, as it seemed a promising platform in the future, but resolving the current build issue remained out of my reach for now. The selection indicated by Christian looks fair enough to me as well. Have a nice day, :) -- Étienne Mollier <emollier@emlwks999.eu> Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da Sent from /dev/pts/4, please excuse my verbosity. On air: To-Mera - Realm Of Dreams
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature