Re: uploading rocm-device-libs 5.0.0
Sure that could be helpful sometimes. You may add that in the
future if you want that. We can go ahead without the CI file
for our circumstance as it's not mandatory.
Of course, don't forward my words to other newcomers please.
Newcomers are encouraged to collect debugging information
through any measure that helps, incl. CI.
On Mon, 2022-02-14 at 21:51 +0100, Maxime Chambonnet wrote:
> (I've just been notified on #debian-mentors that many packages still
> lack the salsa CI files.)
>
> 2/14/22 21:48, M. Zhou wrote:
> > Ok I see. Thank you guys for the quick reply.
> > I shall upload it shortly.
> >
> > On Mon, 2022-02-14 at 21:13 +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > > Hi Mo,
> > >
> > > Maxime Chambonnet, on 2022-02-14:
> > > > On 2/14/22 20:40, M. Zhou wrote:
> > > > > Is there anything remain to be fixed in git before the
> > > > > upload?
> > > > > Upon your confirmation I'll proceed with the upload. Then
> > > > > update rocr-runtime to 5.0.0 as well.
> > > > Hi,
> > > > dev-libs and rocr-runtime 5.0 look good for finalization/upload
> > > > to
> > > > me!
> > > The only change I had to bring (Architecture split) is already
> > > part of the trunk, so you can go ahead I guess.
> > >
> > > Thank you, :)
> >
>
Reply to: