[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#825282: transition: gnat-6



On 26/05/16 12:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnat-6.html
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> Cc'ing debian-ada@.
> 
> On 25/05/16 15:12, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> The upload of gnat (6) about a month ago started the transition from
>> gnat-4.9 to gnat-6. This deserves a tracker.
>>
>> Below is my attempt on a ben file, not sure whether it covers the right
>> things. I just analyzed some uninstallability discovered by piuparts.
>> There are packages that
>>   (Build-)Depends: gnat, gnat-4.9, ...
>> but gnat now Depends: gnat-6 and gnat-6 has Conflicts: gnat-4.9
>> These probably need sourceful uploads instead of binNMUs.
> 
> Everything needs a sourceful upload, per the ada policy (as they rename the -dev packages).
> 
>> title = "gnat-6";
>> is_affected = .depends ~ /gnat-/ | .build-depends ~ /gnat-/;
>> is_good = .depends ~ "gnat-6" | .build-depends ~ "gnat-6";
>> is_bad = .depends ~ "gnat-4.9" | .build-depends ~ "gnat-4.9";
> 
> I have added a tracker at https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnat-6.html
> 
> Why not include gnat-5 in is_bad?
> 
> @ada people: is this useful to you? Are there any changes I could make to make it better?
> 
> Hopefully this helps make the transition shorter.

I removed libxmlezout and aged adacontrol. With that and some decrufts, the
transition went in.

Cheers,
Emilio


Reply to: