Re: Fwd: Bug#688299: libpolyorb3: using diversions in M-A: same packages is a bad idea
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thanks Ludovic and Nicolas,
I will remove the manpage from libpolyorb3. Does my DM status enough in
order to ask for a freeze exception ?
Then when the bug is fixed in wheezy I'll try to sort out if we need
this manpage or the documentation is enough as it is provided by upstream.
Cheers, xavier
Le 22/09/2012 15:24, Ludovic Brenta a écrit :
>> >From its content, the polyorb the manpage has nothing to do in
>> libpolyorb[soversion]: /usr/share/man
>>
>> >From its content, I would advice
>> libpolyorb-doc: /usr/share/man
>> or, easyer to find:
>> libpolyorb-doc: /usr/share/doc/libpolyorb-doc
>
> Since
>
> - there is a single man page in libpolyorb3, namely polyorb.7.gz
> - this man page is very short and almost useless, as it contains a very
> small part of the whole doc
> - this man page is for developers (who use the -dev package) not users
> (who use the shared library package),
>
> my advice is to remove this man page from the shared library package
> altogether. This small change can have a freeze exception and migrate
> to wheezy.
>
> After that, decide where this man page should go; I feel that it is not
> useful as is, so perhaps a better thing would be to rewrite it so it
> becomes an introduction to PolyORB, and package it together with the
> executables in libpolyorb3-dev. That however should wait for after
> wheezy is released (or uploaded to experimental in the mean time).
>
> PS: man pages that document an executable must not be in a -doc package,
> they must be in the same package as the executable.
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQYF9OAAoJEG3iFwasTcfauCEQAKiW7bqy5Aele2QfvWphTiqm
QhvqgEIkIrmeW1PcbHLRg7ICd2jK8i8p82cRqYYfOl0uv9Rhvr+F0uZS7NDlnO7x
1eF9EBOp1XRwae1YlSAsW+cVZ98ZuNlIrhoAGDu6TinkqeUyVX/ybM1fRuCXLb9F
oR3t4hY07+w7QlG8TvqifJhFrFIPiyQzBEz+WSFQBydPHVfr5Xvc4ZvWPISyGzhO
Skoh9JmKI7SjQ521N4u5wGkXnbfj1SRrlSTXkSTL37CidjDThPD802yFs6cLaJfU
rfsaXJXLDrX8O1JRglvbE4AWUFtFB3828n9RvGQHioQWTg/KB5KTQOXb8b+NqlZw
5rSwDBC3jOrUs0c0XgLWUe1cGRNoyUdaV8xBu6iawu4pbByh0K1no+qTcfwp0nTa
KoikUEOk77DTsHMkrRoBl/reRZFAf1Mg0V0xHokeHO/yIlH36G5ds5sLxVbpjdMO
zxwF+sZgcOj4wR8Vvo2gLvqAWALxVQ9SQ1M4fvwIF3iij6iiCRD+IJuOEj31WG6j
09mE8wUz866Vvo2ugJY0StSrJrGZEYvwkAcW2/nE2ciRI9rGJn+V4/ct2nleNqSC
YXP1Xf3vGsvru61VKXicYEgtzCfSQYU/gUk11WLyhKJp5+9KXNn224KzKoXCsDXO
XAGnQc77GRKSvxEuWk6o
=Nf3M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: