[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[FTBFS] PolyORB debug under kfreebsd



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I have two major FTBFS for PolyORB : one for kfreebsd-amd64 and one for
kfreebsd-i386.
I'm investigating the kfreebsd-amd64 one. During compilation of
po_catref I get an undefined symbol :
ADA_PROJECT_PATH="/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/projects:/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/projects"
gnatmake -P polyorb_tools_po_catref.gpr --create-missing-dirs
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/lib -XLibversion=3
- -XLibtype=DYNAMIC -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -R
- -j2    -cargs  -largs -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -bargs -E
gnatbind -shared -E -I- -x
/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/tools/po_catref/po_catref.ali
gnatlink
/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/tools/po_catref/po_catref.ali
- -shared-libgcc -Wl,--as-needed
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/lib -g -O2
- -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -lrt -Wl,-z,relro
- -Wl,--as-needed -R
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-setup
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-corba-cos-time
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-corba-cos-notification
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-corba-cos-naming
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/ -lpolyorb-dsa
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-moma
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-corba-portableinterceptor
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-corba-dynamicany
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-giop-miop
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-giop-iiop
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-giop-diop
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-corba-cos-event-impl
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-corba-cos-ir-impl
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-corba-messaging
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-corba-iop
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-giop
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-corba-cos-event
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/
- -lpolyorb-corba
- -L/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/lib/ -lpolyorb -o
/home/xavier/polyorb-lab/org.debian.polyorb/DYNAMIC/tools/po_catref/po_catref
/usr/lib/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/libgnarl-4.6.so.1: undefined reference to
`clock_gettime'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gnatlink: error when calling /usr/bin/gcc-4.6

I found this symbol in librt.a but trying to add -lrt or the full path
after the -largs doesn't seems to enhance the situation.

Does anyone already encountered such problem ?

Thanks in advance, xavier
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=Yke6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: