[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: polyorb/2.8~20110207-1



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le 21/05/2012 10:16, Ludovic Brenta a écrit :
> Uploaded but FTBFS on all architectures (except my own machine):
> 
> /usr/bin/make run_tests
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/build/buildd-polyorb_2.8~20110207-1-i386-LRvokY/polyorb-2.8~20110207'
> cd testsuite && ./testsuite.py --abort-file=test_failed --diffs \
> --testsuite-src-dir=\
> /build/buildd-polyorb_2.8~20110207-1-i386-LRvokY/polyorb-2.8~20110207/testsuite
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "./testsuite.py", line 16, in <module>
>     from gnatpython.env import Env
> ImportError: No module named gnatpython.env
> 
> Please take advantage of the DM-Upload-Allowed: yes to fix this.

Here is a subset of debian/control :

Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8.9.7), dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1),
 dh-ada-library,
 automake, autotools-dev, libtool, gnat, gnat-4.6, python
Build-Depends-Indep: ghostscript, texi2html, python-gnatpython,
 texlive-formats-extra, texlive-generic-recommended, transfig, texinfo

I suspect that I should move the python-gnatpython from
Build-Depends-Indep to Build-Depends
looking at [1] shows that python-gnatpython isn't installed at all.
Indeed python-gnatpython is needed at test time, during build and not
build-indep

I'll upload polyorb-2.8~20110207-2 as soon as possible.

xavier
[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=polyorb&arch=i386&ver=2.8~20110207-1&stamp=1337434610
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=LX84
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: