Re: sphinx* packages
Hello,
Paul Gevers, on ven. 03 nov. 2017 11:35:06 +0100, wrote:
> The current package of python-sphinxbase contains¹ a (unstripped!)
> static library. Is that on purpose?
No.
> If not, do you see a good reason to keep it (stripped or unstripped)?
For python bindings, nope :)
> I suggest we remove it from the package, but I must admit I don't know
> if that breaks the binding.
I don't think it will break the binding, bindings will use the .so file.
Paul Gevers, on ven. 03 nov. 2017 22:22:40 +0100, wrote:
> Another question. In Ubuntu they switched from asound to pulseaudio. Do
> you think we should do the same? (I have no idea how to judge this, so
> without your consent, I'd leave it as is).
Well, I see the whole Debian moving to pulseaudio, so I guess it makes
sense to follow, even if I personally don't like pulseaudio.
Samuel
Reply to: