[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#836625: marked as done (espeakup: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper)

Your message dated Sun, 4 Sep 2016 17:33:44 +0200
with message-id <20160904153344.GT4050@var.home>
and subject line Re: Bug#836625: espeakup: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper
has caused the Debian Bug report #836625,
regarding espeakup: please drop the build dependency on hardening-wrapper
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

836625: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836625
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: espeakup
Version: 1:0.71-19+deb8u1
Severity: important
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hardening-wrapper

This package builds using the hardening-wrapper package, which
is now replaced by dpkg-dev's DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS settings.

Please consider dropping the build dependency of hardening-wrapper
and use the DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS settings.

The goal is to remove hardening-wrapper for the stretch release.
Discussion about the removal is tracked in https://bugs.debian.org/836162

The severity of this report is likely to be raised before the release,
so that the hardening-wrapper package can be removed for the release.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:0.71-20


Matthias Klose, on Sun 04 Sep 2016 13:16:23 +0000, wrote:
> Package: espeakup
> Version: 1:0.71-19+deb8u1

It seems your scripts are not picking up the right versions... That
version of espeakup was for jessie, notably 1:0.71-20 already fixed the


--- End Message ---

Reply to: