[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [nat-users] Fwd: Bug#830483: natbraille: Please consider moving to Saxon-HE



Hi

This is a known (and hopefully solved) problem : in short,
"saxon-iterate" extension was arbitrarily removed from the free saxon
version years ago. Please read this post about natbraille / saxon he :

http://saxon-xslt-and-xquery-processor.13853.n7.nabble.com/saxon-HE-and-xsl-iterate-td8720.html.

I thought that it had already been solved by writing an alternate and
iterate-free version of miseEnPage.xsl ("page layout") without
saxon-iterate. Seems this correction did not make it to the version you
compile.

-> *Djidjo*, did you port the miseenpage.xsl replacement in
Natbraille-Brailliti ?

Code of alternate and original :

https://svn.liris.cnrs.fr/nat/tags/2.2rc1-sra1.0/xsl/miseEnPage.xsl

https://svn.liris.cnrs.fr/nat/tags/2.2rc1-sra1.0/xsl/miseEnPage.xsl.iterate

> I have added to the git repository this testcase,
> so you can easily try.

Oh, what svn are you referring to ?

Thanks for your work !

Vivien





On 14/07/2016 09:16, Bruno Mascret wrote:
> et la réponse
> 
> 
> -------- Message transféré --------
> Sujet :     Bug#830483: natbraille: Please consider moving to Saxon-HE
> Date de renvoi :     Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:42:01 +0000
> De (renvoi) :     Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
> Pour (renvoi) :     debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
> Copie (renvoi) :     Debian Accessibility Team
> <debian-accessibility@lists.debian.org>
> Date :     Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:40:33 +0200
> De :     Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
> Répondre à :     Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>,
> 830483@bugs.debian.org
> Pour :     Eugene Zhukov <eugene@debian.org>, 830483@bugs.debian.org
> 
> 
> 
> Samuel Thibault, on Wed 13 Jul 2016 23:12:49 +0200, wrote:
>> Eugene Zhukov, on Fri 08 Jul 2016 14:44:08 +0200, wrote:
>> > Please consider replacing saxonb dependency with Saxon-HE.
>>
>> Unfortunately it seems to break natbraille.
> 
> 
> Samuel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply to: