[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: Re: Bug#827741: libatk-wrapper-java: File selection dialog not refreshed when changing directory



Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + patch upstream
Bug #827741 [libatk-wrapper-java] libatk-wrapper-java: File selection dialog not refreshed when changing directory
Added tag(s) patch and upstream.
> reassign -1 openjdk-7
Bug #827741 [libatk-wrapper-java] libatk-wrapper-java: File selection dialog not refreshed when changing directory
Bug reassigned from package 'libatk-wrapper-java' to 'openjdk-7'.
No longer marked as found in versions java-atk-wrapper/0.33.3-7.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #827741 to the same values previously set
> clone -1 -2
Bug #827741 [openjdk-7] libatk-wrapper-java: File selection dialog not refreshed when changing directory
Bug 827741 cloned as bug 827795
> reassign -2 openjdk-8
Bug #827795 [openjdk-7] libatk-wrapper-java: File selection dialog not refreshed when changing directory
Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-7' to 'openjdk-8'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #827795 to the same values previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #827795 to the same values previously set
> clone -1 -3
Bug #827741 [openjdk-7] libatk-wrapper-java: File selection dialog not refreshed when changing directory
Bug 827741 cloned as bug 827796
> reassign -3 openjdk-9
Bug #827796 [openjdk-7] libatk-wrapper-java: File selection dialog not refreshed when changing directory
Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-7' to 'openjdk-9'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #827796 to the same values previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #827796 to the same values previously set

-- 
827741: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827741
827795: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827795
827796: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827796
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: