Re: lightdm

To: debian-accessibility@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: lightdm
From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 21:32:51 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20141203203250.GA3243@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr>
Mail-followup-to: debian-accessibility@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 547F6470.4080604@free.fr>
References: <[🔎] 547E4E86.2040309@free.fr> <[🔎] 20141203181627.GO4003@type.bordeaux.inria.fr> <[🔎] 547F554E.1080508@free.fr> <[🔎] 20141203184207.GU4003@type.bordeaux.inria.fr> <[🔎] 547F6470.4080604@free.fr>

MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Wed 03 Dec 2014 20:28:48 +0100, a écrit :
> There're two at-spi-registryd: one belongs to lightdm, one belongs to the
> user.

Ok, that's expected.

> Are other processes expected?

No.

Samuel

Reply to:

References:
- lightdm
  - From: MENGUAL Jean-Philippe <mengualjeanphi@free.fr>
- Re: lightdm
  - From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Re: lightdm
  - From: MENGUAL Jean-Philippe <mengualjeanphi@free.fr>
- Re: lightdm
  - From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Re: lightdm
  - From: MENGUAL Jean-Philippe <mengualjeanphi@free.fr>

Prev by Date: Failure: g-i-installation_debian_jessie_gnome_brltty/6
Next by Date: Fixed: g-i-installation_debian_jessie_gnome_brltty/7
Previous by thread: Re: lightdm
Next by thread: Re: lightdm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread