Am 21.09.2013 17:43, schrieb Samuel Thibault: > Control: clone -1 -2 > Control: reassign -2 at-spi2-core > Control: retitle -2 Please add libatspi2.0-0-udeb > Control: block -1 by -2 > Control: clone -2 -3 > Control: reassign -3 dbus > Control: retitle -3 Please add libdbus-1-3-udeb > Control: block -2 by -3 > > Cyril Brulebois, le Sat 21 Sep 2013 17:28:42 +0200, a écrit : >> thanks for adding that udeb, but that's still not OK: >> | libatk-bridge-2.0-0-udeb (= 2.9.5-2): FAILED >> | libatk-bridge-2.0-0-udeb (= 2.9.5-2) depends on missing: >> | - libatspi2.0-0 (>= 2.9.4) > > Ah, damn, sure. Will do. This will however also need a udeb for > libdbus, thus cloning for dbus too. > Hm, crap, I've just filed #723953. having yet another udeb (libdbus) is annoying. Couldn't atk just use GDBus so we can avoid this? Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature