[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gnome-orca_3.0.4-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into experimental



Hi.  Yes, I can read the log files now.  To me, the error doesn't make sense.
The parrent closed the pipes and then generates an error about a broken pipe.
If the pipes have been closed, how can one be broken?

          Kenny

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 07:24:17PM +0200, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> I really have problems with permissions on FTP. Can you try again and
> tell me if now it works please?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
> 
> 
> Le samedi 30 juillet 2011 à 09:23 -0500, Kenny Hitt a écrit :
> > Hi.  I get a 403 forbiden error when I try to view the log.
> > 
> >           Kenny
> > 
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 03:51:07PM +0200, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> > > Actually I did a last test. Here's the speech-dispatcher's log:
> > > http://demo.accelibreinfo.eu (contains espeak-pico.log and
> > > speech-dispatcher.log). In my opinion it shows that the program runs
> > > properly, but there's a problem with pico module. What do you think?
> > > Should I report bug?
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Le samedi 30 juillet 2011 à 15:32 +0200, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL a écrit :
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > Your answers enable me to study things differently. And I release my
> > > > problem is, first, with Pico. Does someone use it? Here I get "broken
> > > > pipe" at some time, so orca 2.91 starts speaking, then stops. I
> > > > investigate why but if someone knows the thing... Once that's solved
> > > > I'll update again orca.
> > > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > 
> > > > Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Le samedi 30 juillet 2011 à 14:25 +0200, Halim Sahin a écrit :
> > > > > hi,
> > > > > If this is a orca from the x-desktop git-branch it works under
> > > > > gnome-2.x.
> > > > > In this case you don't need to update to at-spi2.
> > > > > BR.
> > > > > Halim 
> > > > > PS.: orca-xdesktop runs well under Squeeze :-).
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 



Reply to: