Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> writes: > Frans Pop, le Tue 18 Mar 2008 21:05:30 +0100, a écrit : >> On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> > I was wondering: since one of the goals of d-i for Lenny is to have a >> > 2.6.24 kernel, and that it happens that that kernel has enough hooks for >> > speakup to be compiled as a module, would it be ok to include speakup in >> > the standard images, as a module which would be auto-loaded through a >> > kernel parameter? [...] >> The module will first need to be included in the regular Debian kernel image >> packages of course. > > Ah, can't it be a separate package? Isn't linux-modules-extra-2.6 where all the extra modules belong? Seems logical to work speakup into the linux-modules-extra-2.6 source package and have it produce binary packages named speakup-modules-2.6* like the other module packages in there. > (speakup can now be compiled fully independently) linux-modules-extra-2.6 seems like the perfect place for speakup, now that it does not require the kernel to be patched anymore. -- CYa, ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/> .''`. | Get my public key via finger mlang@db.debian.org : :' : | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44 `. `' `- <URL:http://delysid.org/> <URL:http://www.staff.tugraz.at/mlang/>
Attachment:
pgpnJ53ZfZRtt.pgp
Description: PGP signature