Re: reliable reproducer, was Re: core dump analysis

[Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>]

On Thu, 20 Apr 2023, Michael Schmitz wrote:

> Am 20.04.2023 um 18:04 schrieb Finn Thain:
> > On Wed, 19 Apr 2023, I wrote:
> >
> >> Oddly, the program never detects any stack corruption when run on the
> >> QEMU '040.
> >>
> >
> > I tested a Motorola '040 and got the same result.
> 
> OK, that would mean the bus error was just the most reliable way to get 
> do_signal_return run after child process termination, and the signal 
> delivery itself may be responsible for stack corruption.
> 

I agree (I assume you're replying to my other message about the absence of 
swap).