Re: RFC: Support non-standard extension (call via casted function pointer)
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> writes:
> I think you are missing the point, Andreas. Absolutely no one is
> argueing that the code in question is not valid. The point is, however,
> that this type of code does exist in the real world and runs fine
> on any architecture except m68k due the fact that we have separate
> address and data registers.
Except on ppc64le, until someone came along and changed the lie to a
different lie. So why not lie a little different still, given you know
you have crap code?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Reply to: